December 4, 2008

If You Eat Your Vegies Will You Make Contact With ET?


Here it is, approaching Christmas, a time of year when we kick back, take a breath and ponder over the years UFO events. Sometimes you get so busy with the “doing” that its easy to forget the “being”. And while we’re on the subject, can someone tell us how you have to “be” to make contact with ET? There’s a few theories floating around that, when you weigh them up, don’t really make any sort of sense.

For example, There’s the “spiritually developed people will make contact with ET” theory. Well some people believe that ET is a bit picky and choosey over who they contact. Not for them the drunken bum in the gutter, they prefer the human who is well on their way to spiritual enlightenment – presumably this will make it easier on the ETs, somehow. But don’t worry, ET can still use those bums in the gutter in their breeding program, apparently.

Then there’s the theory that humans must be ‘pure of body’ to make contact. This means no eating meat or sullying ourselves with drugs and alcohol (some believers even deny themselves sex…egads). Apparently having a pure body makes contact more desirable. Hmm. Making contact with ET is starting to sound more and more like joining a Buddhist monastery, huh.

But why DOES ET put so many caveats on making contact? Why are they concerned with our spiritual development and our physical state of being? What would it matter? We’re here, we’re mean, and we’re not very green. They either want to meet us or they don’t, and how long do they plan to wait until we make ourselves presentable? Why hang around, taunting us with their presence, if we’re too distasteful to make contact with?

Well in our not so humble opinion, as we perch in our ivory tower, it’s all human projection. As far as we’re concerned ET gives bugger-all about our “development”. We’re sure they have concerns about their emerging galactic neighbours but they’ve had a long time to learn to cope with those who may not be up to scratch.

So in the spirit of the season, we suggest that ET show us some tenderness and mercy and stop beating around the bush. Make yourselves overtly known to humanity, love thy fellow, um, being and get on with it. It’s what Christmas is all about! Isn’t it?

November 8, 2008

The Truth Is Out There

Source: Weekender, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia. 6 November, 2008
http://www.theweekender.com.au/features_det.php?id=288

It’s a question most people have pondered at one time or another: Are we alone in the universe? As UFO sightings again hit the headlines, it’s clear there is no easy answer or explanation. But one Sunshine Coast research group, based in the centre of an “alien hot spot”, has spent the past decade looking to the skies for answers.

Words GREGORY STANTON

Our minds often dismiss aliens, UFOs and paranormal activities as absurd. But there are many who believe. They carefully document, research and share their experiences and encounters with phenomena that are not easily explained. They believe there really is something out there. Paul Boulton is just one such person who, after “cross-referencing forever”, has developed a lifelong fascination with UFOs and the paranormal. “There is so much that’s not known,” he says.

A psychic therapist who works out of Montville, Paul’s main area of work is emotional trauma, including clients with instances of alien encounters (previously called alien abductions), although the number of such treatments is miniscule. He is also a member of private research group UFOria, based in the Sunshine Coast hinterland. The “diverse” group (he won’t elaborate any more to protect its privacy), now in its 11th year, meets every two weeks to consider sightings on the Sunshine Coast, generally regarded by UFO researchers as a hot spot of activity.

The airspace above the hinterland is reportedly used by an abundance of extra-terrestrial craft, but also by military and commercial aircraft. “Our goal is to create a safe forum to allow people to discuss what they’ve seen and felt,” Paul says. “If someone tells me they have seen an unidentified flying object, then I have to work out whether they have seen a galactic ship, a military black-ops project, otherwise known as an alien replication vehicle, or a terrestrial-based alien culture’s vehicle. There is also the possibility of misidentification of something else. ‘Unidentified’ adds to the mystery.“The number of encounters is difficult to calculate, but the individual feels emotionally helpless and insecure,” Paul continues. “Because of the memory blocker factor, people are frequently hovering between ‘Did it happen?’ and ‘Will people believe me?’ It’s only after a long time of contact that people may feel I’m safe to talk to. “Usually, when people try to integrate back into society after an encounter, it’s not unlikely they’ll live a solitary life because of our limited world view and the naivety of our mindsets. It was real for them but not in the wider view.”

According to Paul, UFO sightings are statistically on the rise worldwide. UFO stories began circulating more readily after the infamous Roswell incident in 1947, where several eyewitnesses spoke of an unexplained aircraft crash in the US state of New Mexico. An initial press release from the Roswell Army Air Field on July 8, 1947, said personnel had recovered a crashed flying disc. It was later denied by the Commanding General of the Eighth Air Force. Despite evidence to the contrary, the public was told it was nothing more than a weather balloon.Further clouding the issue was the fake video that surfaced, supposedly depicting an alien autopsy. In 2006, the promoter of the film, Ray Santilli, revealed the footage was not entirely genuine.

Brisbane-based association UFO Research Queensland lists 72 reported sightings last year on its website. Functioning since 1956, the number of reports so far this year looks set to eclipse that figure. A reason for higher sightings could be the prevalence of hand-held recording devices to capture a sighting, with the ability to instantly upload to internet sharing sites.“The importance of this is that (the image) hasn’t been filtered,” Paul says, alluding to the ever-present threat of a cover-up. “The goal of the disinformation community is to keep the public in a state of uncertainty and confused anxiety. They attempt to suggest the topic is only of interest to the lonely and unhinged.” This goes hand in hand with media coverage.

“It’s a funny topic,” he says. “If a person is not responsive to it, I end up looking like a loony. Authenticity is the key.”There are plenty of believers. Former US president Jimmy Carter filed a UFO sighting in 1973. Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell is one who strongly believes in alien activity while pop star Robbie Williams has made headlines of late with talk of contact and plans to become a ufologist. In May, British Government files released under Freedom of Information laws recount UFO sightings compiled by the Ministry of Defence between 1978 and 2002. Of particular interest are the corroborated witness accounts by air traffic controllers, pilots and policemen.

Movies and popular culture play a major role in complicating matters, from the tinfoil helmets of Signs to the kind of hostile invasion seen in everything from The War of the Worlds to blockbuster Independence Day. “There’s a big problem with disinformation coming from the movies,” Paul says. “We seem to have the cultural capacity of chickens: we shoot it first then do an autopsy, rather than thinking how we interact with aliens. That anxiety filters down through public thought. Anxiety is an amazing thing. They can rule with massive insecurity in the public.”Conspiracy theories are synonymous with UFOs and aliens. It is said upper echelons of governments have been using alien-inspired technology for decades. Folkloric events such as the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project in World War II supposedly investigated time travel and invisibility. Since then, technology has advanced to proportions similar to the film Men In Black.

It is with a wry smile Paul suggests viewing the 1997 film, minus the hostile alien nature, as a documentary. But governments deny any cover-up.“That’s what anyone is up against in trying to present their findings,” he says. “This keeps everyone under a limited Newtonian view.” It has been estimated one in every 50 people in the US has had contact with extraterrestrials and UFOs. “When you’re looking at more than 301 million people, that’s a lot of people,” Paul says, although he suggests memory blockers are in use. Paul proffers that aliens live among us and have done so for centuries, alluding to the amazing feats of ancient Egyptian and Mayan civilisations as examples.

Sharing a view with many, he implies some aliens can invisibly cloak themselves, and look human. But there is no malicious or hostile intention.Former emergency doctor from North Carolina, Dr Steven Greer — who Paul calls a credible expert in the field — filmed more than 450 personal accounts and testimonies from willing military, corporate, intelligence, government, scientific and aviation personnel in a 2001 venture, The Disclosure Project. “After researching the UFO topic for more than 20 years, I have never read such well-researched first-hand accounts on the topic of UFOs, extra-terrestrials and their vehicles, life forms and their intentions and interactions with humanity,” Paul says.

“The overall theme is no threat or harm is meant to us.”As a researcher of the paranormal, Paul is not averse to investigating the unusual. He recently escorted Bill Homann, the custodian of the Mitchell-Hedges Crystal Skull, on its Sunshine Coast visit. The skull, discovered by F.A. Mitchell-Hedges in Belize in the 1920s, was brought to Australia by Duncan Roads from the Montville-based Nexus Magazine and was the main event at a conference at Twin Waters last month. While in the company of the skull, Paul noticed it resonated with people who were intuitive and open, often to startling effect. One example was an elderly woman who was able to dispense with her cane. But for Paul, UFOs and alien encounters are more than just intriguing. “There’s a bigger picture truth,” he explains. “If you look at where we are as a planet, we are quarantined in the solar system. We are at the end of a cul-de-sac. This means we are visited, but it also means we are subjected to a lot of disinformation.” One way or the other, the truth is out there.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

THE X-FILES From the files of UFOria

A woman driving home at midnight from Maleny notices a disc-shaped craft about 7-10m wide fly nearly 15m above her car for the entire journey. When she turns into her street, it flies ahead and hovers across from her house. She watches as the craft moves slowly away.

UFOs are often reported coming out of the ocean off Coolum.

One couple is visited by a large craft with a strong downward draft above their home. The power from the craft causes the house to shake violently and several household items break. They don’t recall anything afterwards.

A UFO is seen travelling slowly through the hinterland at Witta. It comes from the Lake Baroon direction and lights up the ground as it flies. It hovers quietly in front of the witnesses’ house.

Some people came out of their house late one night to watch the moon land in a nearby field. They remember nothing else for several hours.

Various blinking lights and unexplained glowing in the sky have been reported over Tewantin, Flaxton, Tinbeerwah, Cooroy and elsewhere on the Coast.

July 29, 2008

UFO Witnesses Require An Apology and Reconciliation

Aboriginal reconciliation has been a hot topic in Australia for years now. The Australian government has finally agreed upon the unique status of indigenous Australians and their need for recognition, respect and understanding in the wider community.


However there is another group of people whose needs remain unaddressed and this is the collection of witnesses who have experienced UFO sightings or close encounters with extraterrestrials and/or their vehicles.

Over the years these people have been forced to live with their experiences in secret without the support they require from society. Their experiences remain invalidated by the wider community due to it’s lack of education about the existence of extraterrestrial life. This is a result of the various authorities and institutions that our civilization requires to act as its guide, and who indeed have this knowledge, and are withholding it from the general public. The true reason for this remains complex and elusive, and without full disclosure can only be speculated upon at best.

Nevertheless, the results are the same. A group of people within our society remain unrecognized, disrespected, humiliated and invalidated. They’re forced to live with a secret so profound that it drives wedges within their families often leading to family breakdown, estrangement and/or divorce, as well as loss of status among their friends, workmates or peers. The escalating stress caused by this lack of understanding of their experiences by others often leads to the manifestation of illness, behavioural problems or drug abuse in order to cope with experiences that far exceed the range of usual human experience.

They turn to voluntary UFO organisations - which lack manpower, funding and skills - to find answers to the meaning of their experiences. In Australia this situation has been compounded by the fact that in January 1994 the Australian Department of Defence advised they would no longer receive reports of UAS (Unusual Aerial Sightings), and members of the public seeking to report UAS to the RAAF would be referred to civilian UFO organisations.

This policy change, which the DOD claimed was the result of declining reports to the RAAF, came the same year UFO Research Queensland Inc received 512 reports from the public. The following year it received 813 reports, the most reports received in one year since the establishment of the organisation in 1956. Due to the overwhelming amount of these reports UFORQ and other similar organisations around the country continue to struggle to meet the needs of witnesses.

This situation is unsatisfactory. The authorities and institutions responsible for withholding the relevant information that can educate the public about the extraterrestrial situation need to face their responsibility to the people and come forward with the truth. It’s time to validate witness experiences by releasing what it knows to the public. If people like Dr Edgar Mitchell, the 6th man to walk on the Moon, who stated in a public interview last week that ETs exist, then so can others. (listen to interview here
http://www.kerrangradio.co.uk:80/Article.asp?id=804160&spid=)

It’s time these witnesses were allowed to come in from the cold and be part of society once again. The greater public will only accept these people and their experiences in a new context which includes the reality of extraterrestrial existence within the public mind. The eradication of ridicule and rejection can only be achieved through reeducation via a campaign of raising public awareness of the subject. Civilian UFO groups can only do so much given their voluntary status and lack of resources, so the reeducation of the public needs to come from those who can provide these resources.

Many actions are required from governments, the media, the UFO community and the greater public, but many people have to work together.

To date, the global UFO community has been willing to work towards reeducating the public but this has had minimal success. It’s now time for larger groups to become involved and help the hundreds of thousands of witnesses world wide to be accepted within society. Only with the help of this larger group will this be achievable. All aspects of community must be cared for without exception.

July 19, 2008

Tracking The Unknown


The Satellite News, Brisbane. June 25, 2008

Do you believe in aliens? Jindalee residents study extraterrestrial life.

Do aliens really exist? Jindalee residents Martin and Sheryl Gottschall have no doubts the cosmos is filled with extraterrestrial life attracted to the sunshine state. The local skywatchers are members of UFO Research Queensland, a voluntary, non-profit association established in 1956 to receive, record and research UFO sightings.

They claim the existence of a large body of well-attested sightings so unambiguous, the only reasonable inference is that extraterrestrial vehicles are flying through our atmosphere, landing on the ground and entering our oceans.

The Brisbane-based group also provides support to individuals whose alleged encounters with UFOs have left them distraught, confused and searching for answers.

The married couple believe governments across the world will no longer be able to keep UFOs as an ‘X-file’ from society as the number of alien witnesses continue to increase.

Mr Gottschall, who is the organization’s sighting officer, said he had studied UFOs for the past 40 years after his ex-wife sighted one the size of a bus in front of their Adelaide home in the 1960s. “My wife was about to hop into her car when she saw the UFO in front of her. She yelled out to me but for some reason I ignored her”, he said. “When I finally went out it had disappeared but I believed her because of the look on her face.”

Also a consultant mechanical engineer, Mr Gottschall said he wanted to understand the science behind what made UFOs hover above the ground without making a sound. “About 20 years ago I realized that the craft is able to manipulate both space and time,” he said.

Unlike her husband who has had just one sighting, Mrs Gottschall has had four. “I’ve had sightings at Mt Gravatt, Wivenhoe Dam, Ipswich and above the Gateway Bridge,” she said. “I can’t explain why I have seen so many while others haven’t seen any. I guess some people just have an encounter prone personality type.”

Mrs Gottschall said she had also encountered an unknown life form in 1990. “I saw three small grey beings standing at the end of my bed,” she said. “As soon as I saw them I pulled the sheet over my head and started to pray. The next thing it was morning.”

Mrs Gottschall said she became fascinated with paranormal activity while hosting home bible-study groups about 20 years ago. “I started reading the bible because I questioned what our reason for being was,” she said. “I soon noticed a strong parallel between experiences of those who believed to see aliens and those who believed to see angels.”

UFO Research Queensland holds one meeting open to the public each month. The next meeting is on this Friday from 7.30pm at the Australian College of Natural Medicine, corner of Brunswick and Water Streets, Spring Hill.

June 17, 2008

ET Eyes Natural Wonders of Queensland

Source: The Courier Mail. June 17, 2008

ALIENS are visiting Queensland, attracted by its natural wonders like the Great Barrier Reef, according to a local UFO watchers' association.

Scientists have long speculated about the possibility of life on Mars, and US space agency NASA has spent years and many billions of dollars in the search. But a group of dedicated Queenslanders believe extraterrestrial life can be found much closer to home. Queensland is a hotbed of UFO activity, according to local experts who have dedicated their lives to studying the phenomenon.

UFO Research Queensland is a voluntary, non-profit association established in 1956 to receive, record and research UFO sightings. They claim the existence of a large body of well-attested sightings that proves extraterrestrial vehicles are flying through our atmosphere, landing on the ground and entering our oceans. The Brisbane-based group also provides support to individuals whose alleged encounters with UFOs have left them distraught, confused, and searching for answers.

Sightings officer Dr Martin Gottschall has been studying UFOs for more than 30 years after an encounter in Adelaide in the late 1960s.The consultant mechanical engineer, whose wife Sheryl is chairwoman of the UFO group, said they received hundreds of reports each year. "We have collected thousands of sighting reports in Queensland," he said. "I remember years when I had over 40 calls a day. Plus, there are several groups collecting information. Ours is not the only one."

Dr Gottschall says Queensland's natural wonders could be the drawcard. "The occupants of these craft appear to be interested in the vegetation and one of the objects of study is the Great Barrier Reef," he said. "There are other areas in Queensland that seem to be so-called hotspots. One that has lasted for a long time is up around Tully. I think there's reason to suspect there might be one or more alien bases in that locality, probably underground or underwater. "

Kay McCullock, who says she has had encounters with extraterrestrials, is an independent UFO researcher and co-ordinator for UFORQ's Warwick, Southern Downs and Granite Belt regions. The ex-private investigator has begun a program aimed at making contact with alien life forms." A group of us go out into the field and do real-time research," she said. "We're out there measuring frequencies, looking at the landscape and detailing everything. We're specifically using frequency, colour and sound and also very advanced meditation and thought processes."

But, for every believer, there is a sceptic. Associate Professor Michael Drinkwater, Head of Physics at UQ, firmly believes there is no credible evidence of the existence of extraterrestrial craft. "There are a lot of crazy things in the sky which we don't understand, but I personally think anything we've seen so far we'll eventually find natural explanations for," he said. "The eye and brain do incredibly complex analysis when you see something, particularly at night. "When you see something that is unusual, the brain interprets it as something more physical and more real than it actually is. I've seen something called a fireball which is a very large meteorite, so large it lights up the whole landscape at night time. "My eyes told me it was something so low, it crashed over the next hill, but I know from science that it's more than 20km up in the atmosphere and my eyes are giving me the wrong message."

June 6, 2008

Vatican or Vatican't?

The Vatican’s latest public proclamation on extraterrestrial life that says ‘Oh yes, there just might be ET’s out there, and they just might be closer to God than we are’ causes one to wonder what might be gained from making such a comment. Not merely agreeing to the existence of ET life, but elevating them to a higher standard in God’s eye than mankind, these comments made by the Pope’s chief astronomer, Father Gabriel Funes, would surely have raised the eyebrows of the Catholic faith.

A notion that would once have resulted in a burning at the stake is now imparted to all asunder to read in the Vatican newspaper. Though this statement invites more of our ‘what do you know that we don’t know’ rigmarole, it does seem as though the Vatican may be on to something that the rest of us aren’t. Furthermore, they seem open to the idea that life on other worlds could be more spiritually advanced, and hence closer to the Lord, than we will ever be. However, as one of our previous posters commented, would that then make ET angelic?


There are many people who would insist that ET visitations are indeed similar to, or in fact are, angelic. There are many overlaps in both milieus, not least of which being that ET is here to guide us, to help us, and to make sure we don’t screw up the planet. There are also just as manycases for the opposite to be true, those that believe that ET is a demonic force in the universe. In fact both positions may be true - if the Pope’s astronomers think there are ETs out there closer to God than we are, it also holds that there are ETs out there who are closer to Satan. A race so evil and so far fallen from grace that they must make humanity look good – if such a thing were possible!
So what does it mean when the Vatican comes out with statements advocating the existence of ET life and slotting said life into religious hierarchies? Like all large organisations the Vatican doesn’t issue press releases for no good reason. It also vets said releases carefully, and its representatives do not loosen their tongues lightly. So the question left begging is why did they say anything at all?

Is the existence of ET life to now become a respectable teaching of the Catholic church? How will that affect it’s followers? Will it create yet another breakaway group, one which believes Christ died for the Klingons too? Stay tuned….

May 19, 2008

Close Encounters of the Hamburger Kind


Cattle mutilations have long been one of those weird mysteries of Ufology. They are kind of like a dirty secret – they’re in your face, but like great uncle Harry’s peculiar toilet habits, we don’t like to talk about them.

There’s long been debate over whether they’re related to the UFO phenomenon at all, or are a phenomenon in their own right. And if they are indeed related to, are a byproduct of, or in fact are the raison d'être of our ET visitations, they’re damn peculiar.

We’ve long known that cattle are closely related to humans. It’s probably why whole corporations are built upon them, and why we spend so much time, money and effort grinding them up into uniform little patties that we sell wholesale. Just like humans (according to the cannibals we’ve interviewed), cows taste mighty fine. It has been posited that perhaps the reason for ET’s interest in cattle could be this close genetic relationship – rather than experiment on people (because people might notice a sudden decrease in population), that some of the more invasive or deleterious experimental work could be done on our bovine relatives.

Well, scoff at that idea at your peril. According to a report at the ABC Science site, http://tinyurl.com/5s4crs
, UK researchers have created embryos using human cells and the eggs of a cow. For what purpose is hard to define, since the researchers assure us that they are neither going to use the resultant hybrid embryos for any useful purpose, nor are they allowing any of the mutants to live past 14 days, ensuring that no horror-movie abominations survive to rampage through downtown London.

However it does throw another slant on the entire cattle mutilation scenario. What if it was genetic material (in bulk) that ET was needing all this time? What if cattle tissue, cells, eggs, sperm and blood is useful in the Human-ET cloning process? Are cattle the ‘I Can’t Believe It’s Butter’ component in the (supposed) ET-Human clone initiative? Or are cattle the ‘Hamburger Helper’ that ET requires to beef up (no pun intended) their human burgers? Oh dear. We’ll never be able to look at a cheeseburger in quite the same way again….

May 10, 2008

The UFO Why Questions – Oz Style

Why? Why? Why? Over the years we’ve been asked so many why questions about UFOs that it’s left our heads spinning. The types of questions people ask are intelligent and logical, yet when it comes to giving good answers not many can come up with them. One person who does address the why questions is Stanton Friedman but it’s a short list and there’s oh so much more to ask. Maybe it’s because we live on the underbelly of the globe who knows, but here in Australia we are a fairly simple people who just need to know a few basics. Things like:

1. Why don't people know more about the UFO phenomenon?
2. Why are only a few people doing the job of uncovering the truth about UFOs?
3. Why don’t people care that they've been lied to by the authorities about the existence of UFOs and are living under a delusion because of those lies?
4. Why don't researchers get together on a GLOBAL scale to create a true groundswell that will bring about real awareness?

1.Why don't people know more about the UFO phenomenon?
More people know about the existence of UFOs these days than they ever did and there are two main reasons for this. Television and the changing scientific acceptance of the subject. Science fiction shows like Star Trek and The X Files have been able to explore the more fantastical aspects of the phenomenon and have done a lot to awaken the public to the UFO subject. Mostly it's been a shallow, abstract version of the extraterrestrial reality, but for some it’s created a springboard into the subject that may not ordinarily have occurred.

As for a changing scientific acceptance of the subject, some may not see this so clearly. However, in the last 20 years scientists have not been so fixed in their common mantra “we are alone in the universe”. Instead we’ve seen a more pronounced study of panspermia and exobiology, the discovery of new planets, the exploration by quantum physics into other dimensions, cosmological discoveries via the Hubble telescope, the Mars missions, MIR and the International Space Station, all colliding to change the direction of modern scientific enquiry into humanity’s place in the universe and other life we might share it with.

Meanwhile, western society has become so scientifically "aligned" that when scientists began to change their thinking, the public soon followed. Why? There's a prestige in western society that accompanies scientific understanding. Scientists are portrayed as being highly intelligent individuals and if you understand them and agree with what they say you must be intelligent too. And we ask you….who doesn't want to appear intelligent?

However, the hidden problem this has created in UFO research is that this scientific seduction has blinded UFO researchers from a true exploration of ufological anomalies.

2. Why aren't more people curious or investigating UFOs ?
This is the easiest of all questions to answer. Hidden competing emotional commitments. What’s that you ask? Emotional commitments could be described as supporting our personal internal reward system. In other words, we perform certain behaviours because we’re rewarded for doing so. For example, people work hard and maintain standards of excellence in business practice because the reward is income, customer loyalty and return custom. But where’s the reward in studying UFOs? People who do so often face social ostracism, loss of status, sacrifice of personal time, loss of esteem from family and friends….shall we go on? As you can see there’s very little reward in tripping down the UFO path, so most people don’t.

However, the good news is that buried in the deeply twisted recesses of the psyche of some people (like us) there’s a greater emotional payoff to explore the UFO issue than to leave it alone. For some it’s sparked by our own experiences and the consequent search for answers. For others a more general answer may be that the UFO subject is a deeply profound tool for personal growth. In the long run, expanding personal awareness is of great benefit to our lives and extremely satisfying in ways that can be difficult to articulate.

3. Why don’t people care that they've been lied to by the authorities and have been living under a delusion because of those lies?
Wow! How long are you willing to sit and read this blog? Okay we’ll try to keep it short. In all honesty if you don’t know by now that governments are willing to lie to the people who put them in power then you’ve probably been living under a rock. So what if the government has been lying about something that has the potential to create so much social upheaval that life on this planet will probably never be the same? Well what if the outing of that lie then caused the citizens of this planet to concern themselves with the question of alien motives and Earth’s planetary defense capabilities? (and that’s just one question off the top of our heads!)

We know SETI loves to promote the idea that advanced ET societies will probably have evolved past any malicious intent, but it’s equally possible this is not the case. Then what? Okay, we’re still here and seemingly unharmed, that’s true, but will this always be our situation ? Do we really want to worry ourselves with such things when it’s the role of the defense force to deal with it, even if in reality they can’t defend this planet against technologically advanced malevolent ETs? Better not to think about such things….really. In this case living with a lie is good….right? Wrong actually, but that’s how most people reason, at least subconsciously.

4. Why don't researchers get together on a GLOBAL scale to create a true groundswell that will bring about a real awareness of UFOs and disclosure?

The reasons why people are drawn to become ufo researchers in the first place are quite varied and not every person who does has the temperament to become an activist.

This is a voluntary field of endeavour so the areas people become interested in are decided by their individual interests and not a shared goal. This culminates in researchers working in pockets rather than under the auspices of a large organization that is established with one clear goal in mind. Over the years individual researchers have been working towards disclosure and still do. In recent times the Exopolitics Institute has emerged, establishing itself in various countries around the globe, with the aim to gather credible whistleblower testimony from political, military and private citizens. Although there are those who do not agree with various aspects of their work, the fact is this group has a clear goal and a shared vision which works in their favour.

Currently there is no clear, shared single vision among the general UFO community. In the past various national bodies have arisen in countries but generally they don’t receive long-term support. That’s not to say it cannot be achieved, but the right people have to spearhead such a formation and they must have clearly focused goals. If the ufo community were to ever gather itself together globally, it would truly be a force to be reckoned with. The authorities know this so their best defense against any such groundswell arising has been to create dissent among such formations.

Since disclosure witnesses have spoken out, some have confirmed what researchers always expected: that there are indeed debunkers peppered within the UFO community whose job is not only to throw shadows of doubt over the UFO subject but to discourage the UFO community from pursuing certain paths of inquiry or collaboration and create division where possible. Researchers need to be aware of this and observe those within the UFO community that may be creating the most division. This may just be their goal.

April 28, 2008

UFOs: 50 Years of Denial….and then some

Recently we watched the documentary UFOs: 50 Years of Denial which explored the consistent, official UFO debunking process. We’re sure we watched it when it was first released in 1997 but sometimes it takes some years of hindsight before one can actually “get the point”. Part 1 starts here http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=pbaEGiftX6A
(There are 5 parts in total)

Some comments stood out in our mind, one being that the authorities did not want the public to "get excited" by UFO reports. An interesting choice of words, don't you think? To achieve this goal and to overcome leaks from official sources about the reality of the subject, a vast network of ridicule and debunking had to be set in place - and it was, well and truly as this documentary so clearly pointed out. The last thing officials wanted was for public opinion to be mobilised into asking all the right questions of the authorities who weren't yet willing to answer, if ever. They didn't want to be herded down a path they were unwilling to travel which might allow vast opportunities provided by alien contact (one can only begin to imagine what they might be), slip through their fingers. Instead, they had to quickly curb that interest so they could retain control of their chosen direction, and one of the ways this was done was by sidelining all contactee accounts through the consistent installation of the debunking process.

Remember this a time when the UFO phenomenon was brimming with contactee reports that ignited public imagination, causing a deep questioning of the social issues of the time. From reports we've received over the years we know that alien abductions were taking place back then, but it was the contactees who fired public interest. They were the instigators of social unrest among the UFO interested public, not the nightmarish and deeply disturbing alien abductee reports which came with an in-built aversion process called fear. Frightening accounts of this type of ET contact weren’t going to get the public probing too deeply into the subject, naturally enough. That aspect of the UFO phenomenon, at least at that time, would not be the undoing of the cover-up.

To this day even the mere mention of the word contactee in UFO circles triggers this process whose tentacles have become so insidiously entrenched in the psyche of many in the field that it causes an immediate knee-jerk reaction switching off any further discussion. It has become too much of a time consuming effort for researchers to even bother raising contactee cases any more. The final result is the debunking process remains in tact, unchallenged, and the ultimate goal achieved - end of discussion.

Yet it could possibly be the accounts by people such as Ludwig Pallman, Dan Fry, Orfeo Angelucci and Elizabeth Klarer, among hundreds of others, that give us the greatest insights into those with whom we share the universe. To do so we must remain alert to the debunking process that exists within the UFO community and continue our investigation into the truth.

April 1, 2008

Alien Worlds Magazine

Stuart Miller, editor and publisher of Alien Worlds Magazine, kindly sent us a copy of the first issue of his latest project, a reincarnation of his previous eNewsletter UFO Review, now in hard copy under it’s new title Alien Worlds. Thanks Stuart. It contains an unorthodox content mix emerging from the convergence of three disciplines involved in the search for alien life; UFOs, astrobiology and SETI, the latter posing as the high priest of space exploration so we can understand why Stuart included SETI (well almost).

Initially you might wonder what these three have in common. Astrobiology searches for intelligent life holding that if it exists it is far, far away or only microbial in form; SETI which holds that if ET life does exist it is also far, far away, so far in fact that it’s not much use worrying about it; while Ufology claims alien life exists as sentient life forms that visit Earth for a variety of reasons right under our nose even though very few take any notice of it.

The quest then for the editor of Alien Worlds will be to weave this combination into something that will be of value for UFO research given that any ufologist worth their weight already remains abreast of SETI and astrobiology “discoveries”. He’ll also be charged with unearthing if this mix will appeal to anyone in the UFO field besides those that take the “scientific approach only” to Ufology, or miracles of miracles, if it will help birth what anxiously paces outside the UFO delivery room - a wholistic approach to the UFO subject. A challenging quest indeed.

If it is to be the latter then there seems that some other essential components might need to be added to this brew, that is, information from the behavioural sciences, neuroscience and consciousness research. One could also add a splash of the esoteric, since many ancient esoteric ideas now seem to harmonise with modern day quantum physics, string theory and super position hypothesis, just to name a few. In our opinion this would cover all the bases giving a true eclectic approach to the subject, if that were to be the ultimate goal.

Stuart has taken on a great challenge which causes us to wonder whether 2 years down the track he will remain true to the direction Alien Worlds set out to steer. After all, when one rubs shoulders with scientific conditioning for a while it is bound to rub off eventually leaving one akin to the subject in the boiled frog experiment. So the questions remain…. will Stuart remain wide-eyed, bushy-tailed and full of objective wonder? Will scientifically oriented UFO veterans find the magazine “dry” enough? More importantly will it be enough to keep the interest of UFO buffs, researchers, experiencers and the interested UFO public piqued, given they appear to be the magazines target market and that scientists probably won’t read this magazine? All good questions that only time will tell.

Good luck with the magazine Stuart, it’s going to be a fine balance indeed, but if anyone can do it we know you can.

March 8, 2008

Dr Carl Jung…a mere mortal after all?

If you haven’t read Carl Jung’s book by now then you should because, ‘Flying Saucers – A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies’ is a classic. Jung’s primary question throughout this book was whether UFOs are real or if they are mere products of fantasy psychically projected? Although he claimed to explore the question with an open mind, it becomes obvious to the reader that the dear doctor pushes his view that UFOs are a projection of the subconscious human mind only, and do not exist in our reality. One can only wonder if he would have the same view today given the Disclosure Project complete with it’s whistleblower testimony.

However, Dr Jung was only a mere mortal after all, and like many scientists and researchers today found the UFO phenomenon challenged him at his deepest level to go beyond his training and conditioning. One question stood out for Jung, baffling him to understand, how UFOs as psychic projections could throw back radar echo, confounding him immensely no doubt.

Based on the works of Ruppelt, Keyhoe and Menzel at the time, Jung eventually decided that even if UFOs are physically real they are so bizarre that they tax our understanding and credulity to the limit. This is very reminiscent of T.S. Eliots’ words, “human kind cannot bear very much reality” and reveals that even great minds, like Carl Jung, can only tolerate so much.

It also reminds readers of the rift that exists between science and the mystical and that as Jung himself stated, “the interest of many scientists is too easily restricted to the common, the probable, the average, for that is after all the basis of every empirical science.” Fortunately, and eventually, the good doctor became willing to go where few had been before, especially in his lifetime, and was willing to admit that any scientific basis “has little meaning unless something can be erected upon it that also leaves room for the exceptional and the extraordinary.”

We can only wonder what Dr Jung might think of the modern research of Dr Rick Strassman with his subjects using DMT (N-dimethyltryptamine) or the investigations of Graham Hancock into shamanic experiences using ahyuasca, to further our current understanding of alternate realities as well as the possibility of them being stomping grounds for some extraterrestrials. Would Jung approve of psychedelic use and ancient ritual to make contact with ETs? Maybe…maybe not.

However looking back on Jung’s thoughts 44 years later, his work acts as a beacon as well as a warning for researchers, revealing the lack of psychological research into the UFO subject which remains undone but by now should have far surpassed his initial work. Jung himself admits that he found no clear answers to an ET reality and had to be content with having sketched out a few lines for future research. He also stated that the “psychic aspects of the UFO subject play so great a role that it cannot be omitted from any future studies”. He considered that “if military authorities felt compelled to set up bureaus for collecting and evaluating UFO reports, then psychology too, had not only the right but also the duty to do what it could to shed light on this dark problem.”
Yes good doctor, we couldn’t agree more.

March 7, 2008

Don’t drive over .05

A recent image of a UFO careening drunkenly across the London skies has got us thinking. Do UFOnauts have a licensing bureau? And do they have blood alcohol limit restrictions?

The photo in question at
http://tinyurl.com/2sl79k touted as ‘genuine’, seems to us to be not quite so. There are reasons why we think it may be a fake, but there are also a number of reasons why we need to doubt our own reasoning whenever we look at an image of a UFO. In fact why all of us on this planet need to rethink and reconsider our thought patterns whenever we are confronted by things ‘alien’ to our dull Earthly milieu.

Why we think it’s a fake:

Well, just look at it. The pilot is flying too low to the ground, he’s too close to large ground-based structures for safety. Like, doesn’t the pilot care that he might knock over that great big Ferris wheel thingy and kill hundreds of terranian holiday makers? No, no respectable pilot (no matter which planet he trained on) would fly that low or that close to a building, would he? Unless he’s drunk. And from the angle of that spaceship, he just might be.

Also, the UFO in question looks too nice, too clean, too ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’… too good to be true in fact. It looks too human to be extraterrestrial, so it just couldn’t be. Could it?

Further, and more realistically, there is too much rain – it causes pixel interference so nobody can judge accurately if the UFO has been pasted into the image at a later date. You just gotta be suspicious of that, right? Nice big shiny UFO flying too close to an internationally-known landmark on a busy evening. In the rain. It screams hoax. It really does.

However!

Reasons not to judge too quickly and too harshly:

What do we, puny little Earthlings with our puny little Earthling educations and our puny little Earthling imaginations, know of extraterrestrial vehicles? Are we adequately equipped to know one when we see one? Are we adequately equipped to look a photograph of a UFO and judge?

As a society we are unbelievably judgmental, and Ufologists in particular are even more so. Pop a photo of a UFO in front of us and first thing we’ll say will be ‘fake.’ Why, when we are clamouring for evidence, are we the first to discard it when it comes our way? Does the reality confront even we, who are so desperately longing for it?

And who are we to say that an alien vehicle shouldn’t look too clean, or too dirty? Are we allowed to dictate if one is too round or too square, too amorphous or too bright, or not bright enough? What do we know, really know, about how alien civilisations construct their spaceships, their cities, their babies’ bassinets? They’re ALIEN – and that’s the whole point. We wouldn’t know the first thing about an extraterrestrial culture, and we could not ever place our psyches into theirs, so how could we ever predict what their artefacts might look like? They have different psyches, the result of millennia of social and cultural evolution on a different planet. Just as we are the result of millennia of social and cultural evolution on ours.

Too much evidence has been buried beneath good intentions by people who think they know what a UFO should, would or could look like. It behoves us to re-examine all the evidence we have, this time with a non-judgemental eye.

The moral of the story:

Perhaps we need to be less hasty in our urge to dismiss UFO evidence and discourage researchers. Because perhaps the truth has been out there all along, and we’ve just been too self-assuredly smug to see it.

March 6, 2008

Spielberg to launch UFO and paranormal social network?


Hollywood mega-director Steven Spielberg is reportedly setting up a social network for people interested in paranormal and extra-terrestrial activity, inspired by his own personal experiences with the unknown.

The focus of the network will be on people who have an interest in, or have experienced paranormal phenomena, and the network may feature multimedia content of UFO sightings, paranormal activity and user-based content. Stories of Speilberg's own personal experiences with ghosts are widely known; his stay in the Excelsior House led him to become so frightened by alleged ghosts that he fled the room and moved 20 miles away, forming the inspiration for the movie 'Poltergiest'.

The network may have been originally in development with Yahoo, but the project was abandoned before it was launched. But reports suggest that the idea lives on, and a team of developers are aiming for a mid-year launch.

February 19, 2008

Punyverse not so puny?

http://tinyurl.com/29l3ow

Hot on the heels of our earlier post, ‘Across the Punyverse’, comes the surprising news that SETI has also disagreed with NASA’s choice of song. Hi-ho, on one thing at least SETI and we agree: the Beatles suck.

Actually, it turns out that SETI (who – never let it be forgotten – keep insisting they have yet to discover any signs of intelligent life in the universe), are worried that the nasal honking of the Beatles could result in an alien attack. It seems SETI is a tad concerned that if we advertise we’re here, then, well, we’re asking for trouble.

So, SETI, what do you know that we don’t know? More importantly, what do you know that NASA doesn’t know? And if you know something that NASA needs to know, then, dear SETI, you really should be communicating with them. If there really are angry aliens out there and you are worried that the Beatles might disrupt their quiet evenings, you really should’ve said something before NASA tromped all over their beauty sleep.

If readers happen to peruse the article at the link above, they will discover that SETI is quite a-feared of alerting a potentially unfriendly ET species to our existence, and, more specifically, our location. Pretty strange thinking for a group of people that publicly and ostensibly really don’t think there’s anything out there at all. But now, thanks to NASA’s intergalactic faux pas, it turns out that SETI is plain pants-wetting terrified that there IS something out there, and that we might make it mad.

Mixed messages SETI! What do you know that we don’t know? What have you discovered? What don’t you tell us? Why won’t you tell ANYbody, including all those persons or institutions capable of transmitting crappy songs out into the void? (Yes, it turns out some dude with a great honking satellite dish in his backyard transmitted Bob Marley out there about 10 years ago. Jeez SETI, you coulda said something before that happened.)

If our music, our culture, and our pathetic selves are such a dangerous torment to the easily irritated ET, then hell, SETI, you’d best start popping all our satellites out of orbit right now. Because, as we noted in our earlier post, we beam ourselves and our soap operas out into space every second of every day. This big round blue ball of ours must be the noisiest and most irritating disturbance this side of the Crab Nebula.

But don’t worry SETI, we promise it’s safe for you to sleep at night. If the intergalactic noise police were really going to visit and politely ask us to shut up, they’d surely have done it before now. Probably during the 80s – that wretched and embarrassing hiccup in our cultural development…


February 15, 2008

The Paranormal At Penrith Draws Response From Believers



Here's something not many would know - that Sydney's south-west, northern beaches and the Penrith-Blue Mountains region are regarded as 'hot-spots' for UFO sightings.

Those who believe are already convinced, and their numbers might be boosted as a result of an exhibition featuring UFO inspired art at the Penrith Regional Art Gallery The Visitors - The Australian response to UFO's and Aliens. The collection was co-curated by Anne Loxley and Regina Walter who have tapped into not only a rich vein of belief in sightings of UFO's, but also in artistic expression and influence from sources other than just a few re-runs of the X Files.


The exhibition incorporates sculpture, painting (some in 3-D), video , print and installation works as well as an 'evidence room', which is a collation of newspaper, TV and radio reports on the top 30 UFO encounters in Australia with the expert assistance of leading Ufologist Bill Chalker. Some of the collected evidence dates back to the 19th century to present day, and includes a rather compelling front page reports in the Sydney Morning Herald July 20, 1957 with the headline "RAAF jets ready to investigate Katoomba's mystery lights."


Anne Loxely says the evidence room has been a major hook, with people staying for hours examining the detail, and returning for more. She says when planning the exhibition, a clear direction was given. "It was important for us not to appear as zealots, as there is a strong element of faith in this topic. The evidence is being scrutinised by 'straight', seemingly upstanding citizens, who will stay for hours and sometimes return for more."


Beyond the evidence there is the interpretation of the UFO experience of belief, including the works of Pope Alice, who Loxely informs 'believes she is an alien'. Indeed, the exhibition catalogue states she was born in Outer Space in 5252ABCD (but currently based in Brisbane). The artist's work includes alien figures interspersed more earth-bound idols, light, audio and images and with a strong influence from people from indigenous cultures. Other contributing artists are from across Australia.
Adam Norton is inspired by perhaps the best known UFO spot, Roswell, following reports that a flying saucer, and its occupants, was captured in 1947. Norton's Roswell Timeline links events from pre-history to the current day in a large, detailed, linear exhibit that is difficult to ignore.


Other exhibits are more 'down to earth' - or at least they may seem that way. As an eight-year old, artist James de Blass saw a UFO as an eight year old living in Tasmania, and has been influenced ever since as he produces paintings with a strong parallel universe theme. His father's actual interviews on the radio at the time are part of the evidence collection, and his mother attended the exhibition opening. It's the story from a family interested in science, but otherwise, curator Loxley describes as being not unusual, like many of the Visitors visitors. "We've had a phenomenal attendance at this exhibition. Scoffers have stayed away and more open minded have taken the opportunity to look at the evidence and interpretations of what is quite a full on subject. There is at times a real element of faith toward UFO's".


The exhibition runs from December 8, 2007 to February 17, 2008 at the Penrith Regional Art Gallery, 86 River Road Emu Plains. Ufologist Bill Chalker will give a tour, and close the exhibition on Sunday February 17 at 3 pm ($5 charge)

February 11, 2008

Apologetically Yours, signed....The Anecdote

Recently we read on the FQXi blog under the post entitled Are UFOs Foundational? (http://tinyurl.com/3auxze) that “if we [scientists] actually had scientific evidence of advanced alien life, or any alien life, we would all be jumping out of our skins”.

While digesting these eye-wateringly ignorant words we also stumbled across another statement stating that “anecdotal evidence is the least interesting kind of evidence in science, very close to being without value.”

And there you have it in all its magnificent glory, another argument by scientists as to why the UFO subject is a waste of their time - because it’s based mostly on anecdotal evidence. Poor little innocent anecdote - enemy of the objective, dispassionate observation of scientists. It carries no weapons, it doesn’t punch, abuse or maltreat anyone in any way, so why does science run shrieking in the opposite direction at the mere mention of the word? Why do scientists fear it so much? Is the dynamic construct of the simple anecdote too much for them to bear?

Maybe we have to be scientists to understand such things. Perhaps to offer anecdotal evidence for a scientist might be to admit the insufficiency of their knowledge. Could that be a tad too overwhelming for the scientific ego? But didn’t anyone ever tell scientists that science is anecdotal? After all, scientists observe an event then tell others about what they saw. Does that not qualify as an anecdote? Scientists didn’t wake up one day with the foundations of a scientific modality in their mind. They struggled with their mental limitations, entering deep discussions with other scientists, discussing the what-ifs and maybes of atoms, particles and electromagnetic spin and the like, all before they had their breakthroughs. Isn't the scientific world therefore brimming over with anecdotal reporting?

How can one deny the right of the anecdote to exist? Aren’t civilizations built on anecdotes? To deny anecdotal evidence is to stand in a pool of water looking for somewhere else to drink. It is to deny our life, our self. Anecdotes, or more simply, stories, are powerful tools that help us understand what our rigid linear minds cannot. They help us see what has existed right under our nose all along, whether it be how gravity works, how to send a man to the Moon, or whether extraterrestrial life exists.

If the demand for scientific evidence of the UFO subject was less critical of anecdotal evidence it might help us to understand what we obviously do not. Or is there more to it than that? Could it be that it is the power of the truth contained within the witness story that many fear after all…

February 9, 2008

Cosmic Top Secret Location


Lathrop, California

February 5, 2008

Across The Punyverse

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/across_universe.html

At 4.00pm (US-EST) on February 4 2008, NASA, for reasons known only to its erudite self, beamed the Beatles song ‘Across the Universe’ to the North Star, Polaris. NASA told us (ie, the ignorant world) that it did this to celebrate its 50th anniversary of space exploration.

NASA, NASA, NASA…very heavy sigh. What indeed are you trying to tell us?

For the last 50 years you’ve studiously ‘explored’ space with all the resources available to you and never found any sign of life – that you have told us about anyway. And whenever a sign of any pesky extraterrestrial life does emerge you hurriedly funnel those impressive resources into debunking your own findings, just to make sure we don’t get too excited, or too used to the idea that we may have some ET relatives out there, somewhere.

So why, dear old NASA, would you now spend your money on emailing a crappy old Beatles song to Polaris, of all places? Do you know something we don’t know? Have you discovered life, and transistor radios, out there? It must be a curious kind of life you’ve found on Polaris (who, we would like to keep reminding you, you haven’t told us about yet), one that bypassed the beat of the 1960s and apparently requires the overly nasal tones of John Lennon to snap it up a bit.

Who chose you, NASA, as the arbiter of the message humanity might like to send into the void? We don’t recall being asked to participate in a poll, so we assume that you used some other egalitarian method that we must have missed out on. Or did you hold a meeting of your board of directors, catered of course, where you discussed at your leisure which golden oldie best represented our planet and the people on it.

Unfortunately we cannot commend you on your selection. Would not a better choice have been Justin Timberlake’s ‘Bringing Sexy Back’? Or Britney Spears’ ‘Hit me baby one more time’? After all these are the sorts of things humanity thinks about ad infinitum -- sex and violence -- and as Justin and Britney are our current reigning deities we should share them with the rest of the universe, huh. It just seems that if you are going to waste electricity on the biggest pulse of information you’ve ever sent out there, wouldn’t we as a planet have been better served by sending out some useful information about ourselves, so our Polaris pals can decide whether they want to email us back? Or not.

Of course we have skirted the obvious – the fact that our transmissions are being beamed endlessly out into space every minute of every day, boinging from satellite to satellite and thence on to lord knows where. Our ET friends, even if they are as far away as Polaris, already know that John Lennon was a pale and myopic bipedal creature who never cut his hair, and that the population of planet Earth spends all its leisure time obsessing over who can dance and who cannot. One wonders what we could have to tell them that they don’t know already.

So, dear NASA, while your personal message to Polaris was clear and to the point (‘Yoo hoo, here we are! This is the kind of music our board of directors listens to!’), your message to us was somewhat confusing.

Stop playing with our minds – is there life out there or isn’t there? Indeed there seems to be, since you are sending them the hits of the 60s one painful tune at a time.

February 4, 2008

Jesus Doesn't Live In The Toaster & We're Not Nuts


Some may see little green aliens in their dreams and imagine every memory lapse is down to spending time aboard a UFO, but this is not as common in the UFO community as many think. While there are those who certainly fit the image of a wannabe, fantasy-prone personality or are just plain delusional, the reality is that there are no more escapees from reality in the UFO community than there are in the general population.

In fact, dare we say it, there may be more intelligent thinking people circulating in the UFO community than in our society at large. People with degrees in biology, psychology, engineering, microbiology, oceanography, medicine, astrophysics, archaeology, anthropology, education, just to name a few, are heavily peppered amongst the UFO community. In addition, those who lack formal education are successfully self-educated in many areas of life.

In his book, After Contact : The Human Response to Extraterrestrial Contact, Albert A Harrison PhD states that a study was undertaken on 102 Ufologists who were listed in the Encyclopedia of UFOs and it was found that roughly one third of the group held less than a bachelor’s degree, one third held a bachelor’s or master’s degree, and one third held a doctoral degree. Ufologists were highly educated relative to the general population. “Ufologists who believed in the extraterrestrial origin of UFOs were as likely to hold an advanced degree as those who were skeptical. Thus a weak intellect or lack of schooling does not seem to explain an advocacy for the extraterrestrial hypothesis.”

Furthermore, most who circulate within the UFO community have a strong orientation towards the social concerns of our time such as natural health, the environment, governmental management, social inequality, consumerism, and are quite critical of most large institutions in modern society. Typically they reject narrow analyses and despise media as business. In short they are critical thinkers. They may go a bit overboard sometimes but that enthusiasm is driven by their desire for truth and a better world. So if you imagine that people in the UFO community think Jesus lives in their toaster, think again. And if you plan to attend a UFO meeting anytime soon, plan on expecting the unexpected – you may be very surprised.

February 1, 2008

The New Church of Ufology


We are tired of being asked the question: 'Do you believe in UFOs?'

Do we believe in UFOs? No, we don't. Because UFOs aren't a faith, they're a reality. We don't require fervent belief and hope that UFOs exist -- they do. There are photographs, there is film footage, there are physical traces. Unlike the saints of old, UFOs don't need to manifest their likenesses in a piece of toast because they reveal their physical selves to people all the time, every single day.

UFOs are a reality, far more than God who, after all, has yet to appear at or hovering above a shopping mall and pose for a photograph. And if God did pose for a photograph, would the photographer have to run the gamut of disbelief, ridicule, shame and public humiliation that a person who snaps a photograph of a UFO must endure? Hardly, when the face of Jesus in an eggplant receives credible and global media coverage and draws pilgrims from far and wide.

So why must Ufology endure this constant criticism? What status quo does it threaten? Is Science in fact the religion that the New Church of Ufology threatens to topple?

Scientists react to UFOs with the same kind of witch-burning zeal as the Popes of old - and it isn't hard to imagine that the Whitecoats would love to round us up and burn us at the stake for our blaspheming and false idols. All hail the doctrine of evolution. All hail MAN, the greatest pinnacle of biology that any creature on any planet could hope to aspire to!

Or should it be all hail the NEW gods, the DNA-manipulating Greys, the stately perfection of Orthon.

How difficult then is our struggle, fighting against all the old gods of science. Darwin, the Zeus of Evolution, and Sagan, the Ares of our time, zealously guarding the sterile vacuum of space from our irrational imaginations. They rule from on-high, casting their thunderbolts of fear and doubt and confusion upon an unsuspecting world.

How can the tribe fight the gods? More importantly, how can Ufology fight these time-honoured tactics, and win?

January 31, 2008

Feeling Sneaky


Just like Australian band Sneaky Sound System who rocketed to fame with their gold single entitled UFO, a lot of people have seen a UFO but nobody believes them either. How frustrating, but more to the point, how very isolating. Just like the first line of the song that says “ I just don’t wanna be lonely”, thousands around the planet are also being forced into exiled loneliness by hostile skeptics and denialists. As people report their experiences of UFO events to their doctors, neighbours, churches etc, again as the words of the song say, they end up having to bite their tongue for the “plastic man on the telephone”.

Witnesses are continually forced to endure the continuous stream of debunking by the narrow-minded commentary of SETI scientists blabbing on about the simple physics of high school science making intergalactic space travel close to impossible, the casual bald-faced avoidance by skeptics of any serious questioning of UFOs and ET visitation, and the intelligence community hell bent on keeping a lid on the possible negative aspects of the phenomenon that has the potential to ignite public panic.

For those who endure this consistent wash into the falsely turbulent mythology of our current reality, it becomes at times almost too much to bear. Many may feel they are sent far from home and their respective tribes by these experiences, and just like in the song, left wondering “Whats it gonna take to get me back home tonight?”. After all, their goal is that they too, just don’t wanna be lonely - and isn’t that the simple point....?

January 29, 2008

Mirror Mirror On The Martian Wall


The much-discussed news story about humanoid life on Mars was laid to rest this week by among others, The Planetary Society, who pulled the anthropomorphic wool off our eyes to reveal the humanoid-shaped rocky outcropping on an image captured by Nasa's Mars Explorer Spirit, was not a Martian Bigfoot after all. Turns out the "Bigfoot" is actually less than five metres from the rover and no more than about 6 centimeters tall, or thereabouts. While this comes as no surprise the public response to the story and it’s whirlwind circulation in cyberspace around the globe, has revealed, among other things, the naked truth about human self projection.

Spirit has sent back images of another world – Mars, but what did the public see? A reflection of it’s own self, just a hairier version. While we are privy to gaze upon other worlds, or other life-forms, we cannot do so with our narrow human perception and expect to get it right. Our ignorance about ourselves and the human condition is brimming over into our understanding of everything and seems to be the source of our ultimate affliction, hijacking us from a greater reality.

As Australian author Jeremy Griffith points out, “the greatest of all human explorations in the universe is in fact the ‘dark continent’ of ourselves”. The trail explorers blaze through the wilderness of our inner selves will ultimately become humanity’s highway to truth, and a key component to any large scale contact we may ever have with an extraterrestrial society.

January 24, 2008

The War On Error



On 15th January a report was posted by KTVU – TV from California that began with this comment - “Across the globe, researchers searching for signs of life in space were abuzz this week with word that a mystery signal has been picked up by a giant radio-telescope in Puerto Rico.”

That comment caused the hearts of UFO researchers across the globe to go all a-flutter. Yes, all very exciting except the journalist reporting the story got it all wrong. Turns out radio astronomer, Dan Wertheimer, who is affiliated with SETI was interviewed about sending signals into space (so-called "active SETI") as opposed to just listening for aliens. The scuttlebutt is that after the interview Werthmeier talked to the reporter about some of the astronomy he does, including looking at radio transients: bursts of radio waves that are caused by one-off events like colliding neutron stars, exploding stars, and so on.

Somehow in the article the reporter mixed up the observation of the transient signals with detecting a signal from E.T. Worse, the observations of the transients weren't from Arecibo, and they weren't from Wertheimer as initially claimed. It was another astronomer altogether, observing with the giant Parkes radio dish in Australia!

In a retraction, KTVU-TV says the signal has not been confirmed as any sign of extra-terrestrial intelligence, although the Allen array in California is now actively searching for more of these signals.

Well, we want to know who’s raking the media over the coals about getting this story wrong? Who’s making the media take responsibility for circulating false stories? If this were an erroneous story about, say, a presidential candidate, it would have been withdrawn quicksmart and with a lot of loud shouting. But in this case it was a story on the possible existence of little green men that the media got wrong, and really, it doesn't matter if it’s wrong, because nobody takes this stuff seriously anyway. Not even SETI.

January 14, 2008

Mantle Burning


Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, but can Philip Mantle run for his life? Well let's hope so, because Philip will be taking his life into his own hands when he appears at the UFO Congress in Nevada this year, proving once and for all that the Alien Autopsy footage was indeed a hoax.

The perpetrator, Spyros Melaris, claims cudos for the hoax, but we're yet to know the complete whys of it, although some reasons have begun to filter through, most notably in Philip Mantle’s recent expose ‘Alien Autopsy – Game Over’.

Despite the years and years of doubt surrounding the Alien Autopsy film, it seems that some have clung rather steadfastly to the hope that it was real, that this time they held the smoking gun in their quivering fingers. And while the Alien Autopsy footage was the Ufological equivalent to the face of Jesus in a piece of burnt toast, a wine-stained image of the Virgin Mary on great aunt Hilda’s tablecloth, an Elvis Presley bust in a 15 year old tooth filling…well you get the idea….it served as a sign telling us to never give up faith and that yes Fox Mulder, the truth is out there.

Yes indeed, Philip Mantle will surely shatter a few hopes and dreams on Feb 23 in Nevada, and like fervent believers of the true faith, the UFO community may just rise up to burn him at the stake for it. We vigorously suggest that conference organisers ban all those entering the door wearing long white dresses, peaked hoods and smelling of smoke. Good luck Philip, our hearts and prayers are with you.

January 11, 2008

I am, You Are, We Are Australiens


An experienced UFO spotter has lent his support to the theory aliens landed at Uluru and created human beings. Lew Farkas runs the store and holiday park at Wycliffe Well, an internationally-renowned UFO hotspot 380km north of Alice Springs on the Stuart Highway. The Northern Territory News yesterday reported on a US UFO enthusiasts' website carrying a story about aliens landing at the Rock and creating human life.

The event, the UFO Area website claims, is depicted in Aboriginal rock paintings at Uluru. Mr Farkas, 60, said he has spotted about 30 UFOs in his time. "I think it's feasible," he said. "There's more to things in the past and to our lives than we can comprehend. "I think that some other beings from another planet in some format started us off down here. "That's why they keep coming back and checking us out."

Mr Farkas said depictions of aliens were common to the art of many ancient cultures. "They all seem to have a being with helmets on and space-looking characters," he said. "They only paint what they see. "Indians, Aztecs, they've all got space creatures."

Mr Farkas said there had not been a sighting at Wycliffe Well since November 7, when a group of British backpackers said they saw a light hovering around for about 15 minutes before flying off. Outside the tourist season there are not as many eyes trained to the mysteries of the sky.

"Nobody here spends all night sitting around looking at the sky," he said. "If it came early in the evening someone might see it." The Wycliffe Well Holiday Park is popular with tourists keen to catch a glimpse of an alien visitor.

"If you stand outside in the middle of the night you can look in any direction and see the whole sky to the horizon," he said. "If something does move, you can see it."